Instead he loses all visual individuality and appears like any other CG creature from 10-15 years ago. So it fell to Rhys Ifans to pick up the mantle for The Amazing Spider-Man (2012). Alas, Baker never got his shot at transforming into his scaly alter-ego The Lizard.
Curt Connors in Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy, complete with missing arm but reimagined as a professor and semi-mentor for Tobey Maguire’s Peter Parker. Spider-Man fans were thrilled to see Dylan Baker cast as Dr. Some of the digital effects of Spider-Man dodging manmade lightning are fun, but they’re little more than a diverting light show before Foxx comes back onscreen to mug beneath a pound of CG makeup. As originally conceived, he’s a walking set of clichés who is then turned into a neon-blue eyesore. The tonal dissonance between these elements verge on outright disaster, but even in more seasoned directorial hands, it’s hard to imagine Foxx’s Electro going much higher on the list.
#Spider man villains movie#
But whereas that Batman movie was intended to be camp, Foxx is playing a nebbish loser who relies on all the visual shorthand of an SNL sketch-he has a comb over and two-inch thick glasses while singing happy birthday to himself-in a movie where Andrew Garfield’s Spidey is supposed to be mopey and lovelorn, and whose girlfriend is then murdered in front of his eyes at the end of the picture. More specifically, it’s a direct knockoff at the screenplay level of Jim Carrey’s Riddler in Batman Forever (1995). Electro (Jamie Foxx)Īnother winner from The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Jamie Foxx’s twitchy and shallow interpretation of Max Dillon, aka Electro, also felt like it was out of a Schumacher Batman movie. Another reason we’re grateful this particular version of the franchise collapsed.
#Spider man villains plus#
Plus his costume and makeup suck, and that’s in a movie featuring Jamie Foxx’s Electro get-up. His “sort of Green Goblin” seems unnecessarily jammed into the movie thanks to Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach’s obsession with creating an instant Spider-verse, and as a result the character–this is supposed to be Peter Parker’s best friend!–makes no impression whatsoever. He then ends the movie buzzing around on a glider as a grinning psychopath mutated by an injection of magic spider-blood. Played by Dane DeHaan, a moody actor at best and a comatose one at his worst, Harry speeds through an arc in perhaps 15 minutes of screen time that previously took James Franco three movies to complete.ĭeHaan’s Osborn begins his journey by coming home after a decade away at boarding school to be at the deathbed of his father Norman (Chris Cooper). In the confusing, jumbled mess that is The Amazing Spider-Man 2, perhaps no character–well, with the exception of Paul Giamatti’s Rhino–is given shabbier treatment than Harry Osborn. Truthfully, this interpretation of the Rhino character is awful, but I’m sure the paycheck was nice. Riffing on the Ultimate Spider-Man comics’ version of the Rhino, wherein Aleksei Sytsevich is turned into a man entombed in a giant body of robotic armor, Giamatti’s Rhino feels like a leftover from the Joel Schumacher era of superhero movies where every scene was played 568 times too big, and there was no such thing as good dialogue.
But then “cruel” might also describe what a respected actor like Paul Giamatti was doing to the Russian accent in his brief and woefully misjudged appearance in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. It seems faintly cruel to include a villain who was only ever meant to be a throwaway gag (and fodder for the trailers). Yet with so many foxes in the Spidey henhouse, the question becomes who is the best Spider-Man movie villain-as well as who are the ones that never fully measured up? Well, we’ve taken a poll of the Den of Geek staff in order to provide a definitive answer on who is the best villain to ever get caught in Spidey’s web. Just look at the unbridled anticipation about Alfred Molina returning to the role of Doctor Octopus for proof. Despite existing across three continuities, and three vastly different interpretations of the Web-Head, popularity for the best of Spidey’s rogues can last for years-or even decades-after their first appearance. The kind that offers a performance as big and exciting as anything the do-gooders get up to.Īnd in the realm of superhero movies, few characters have had a stronger roster of such baddies than the Spider-Man movies. Nevertheless, there’s still something exciting about a comic book movie villain who does work. That conventional bit of Hollywood wisdom has been disproved by many a superhero movie in the last decade. Your hero is only as good as your villain.
0 kommentar(er)
